![]() We discuss theoretical and applied implications of sequence effects for persuasion phenomena, as well as challenges for further research developing and testing the theory. We illustrate how our predictions for assimilation and contrast effects may be tested by presenting results from an experiment ( N = 216) in which we presented exactly the same arguments but varied the processing sequence. (3) The overall effect of a persuasion attempt corresponds to the recipient’s judgment at the moment the processing of information is terminated. Or, if assimilation is impossible, contrast effects occur. Thus, the interpretation of subsequent information is assimilated to inferences drawn from the initial information. (2) Inferences drawn from initial information are resistant to change. (1) Inferences drawn from initial information may bias the processing of subsequent information if they are either activated rules or valence expectations that are relevant to the subsequent information. SIP features one constitutional axiom and three main postulates: (A) Persuasion is the sequential processing of information that is relevant to judgment formation. SIP also builds on the abstraction from content-related dichotomies in accord with the parametric unimodel of social judgment. It extends assumptions of the heuristic-systematic model, in particular the idea that information encountered early in a persuasion situation may affect the processing of subsequent information. We present a theory of sequential information processing in persuasion (SIP). 2Department of Psychology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany. ![]() 1Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg, Germany.Roman Linne 1*†‡, Jannis Hildebrandt 2†‡, Gerd Bohner 2‡ and Hans-Peter Erb 1 ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |